Either that or she's just trolling around since both you and me explained to her why "people" got "angry", and had nothing to do with showing or explaining English stuff. Well, not even angry, we just turned stroppy with her because it's what she deserves.
Regarding "angry people", those are the ones that go and spam people's accounts with private messages while screaming and crying nonsense.
Última edición hecha por jkhsdjkhsdkj, 02/11/2012 a las 18:04.
Folks, do a favour to the world and jut fuck off k?
Dios mío, Hole, se te ha ido la olla de una manera BRUTAL sólo porque la pobre chica te ha corregido un error xd. Seguro que se arrepiente un montón.
Por cierto, en el último mensaje, más que hablar de ella, parece que te describes a ti mismo.
You wish, honey. Once again, it's not that one has reasons to expect objetivity from your part at all.
You're right. I don't know why I'm talking.
Hey there, I'm using EK!
We always think there is going to be more time.
I am pretty sure you were not angry because of my correction.
Anger?? do you really think you can make me feel anger? government, for instance, can
make me feel anger, but...... you?, you are only a kind of game character and whatever you
say is not going to affect my life at all.
Perhaps it´s you who feels anger, since, as Ann says, (she seems to have read my mind), you
You usually blame on others, what you do yourself. You say that assuming things about people
is something disgusting, however you are the first one to assume things about me.
First of all you assumed I was not going to keep the thread, and as you can see you were
Afterwards, you took for granted I couldn´t understand English and you decided to speak
Spanish, when the only one who was not understanding was you.
Again you assumed I didn´t want to reply, and again you were wrong!
Finally, you assume that I feel anger, but nothing further from the truth.
And now, I want to ask you..... ¿who is the one who assumes things about others???
EDIT: but I'm going to answer to your question. As I explained to you during your firsts days around here, I tend to feel the need of giving back to others what they threw upon others first. If you hadn't assumed unfair things about me regarding the post I deleted we still would be friends. You should've waited first for the explanation of such decision before quickly assuming things that are not true. You did not? Then you got a stroppy attitude from me to you in exchange. This is something both you and Ann (if she was serious of course, she could have been teasing me ) need to understand.
Now, you shall keep on ragening, asking Ann to ban me or going back to the topic you deviated, that I don't care and I'm honestly bored of you.
Última edición hecha por jkhsdjkhsdkj, 05/11/2012 a las 2:59.
Sorry Hole, I forgot to correct your faults but I will do right now.You wrote as it follows:Either that or she's just trolling around since both you and me explained to her why "people" got "angry", and had nothing to do with showing or explaining English stuff.You have got two faults in the first line.Incorrect sentence: "SHE´S JUST trolling around since..." Correct sentence: "SHE HAS JUST BEEN trolling around since..."Again you got confused with verbs tenses. Your next fault is this: "YOU AND ME explained...." . The correct one is this: "YOU AND I explained..."Never object pronouns can preceed a verb, you have to use subject pronouns.And finally your third fault is this: "SHOWING and explaining English stuff". The correct one is this: TEACHING and explaining...."Well, this is enough for today, I will correct you last message faults next time, I´m bussy now.Come on Hole, pay attention to my explanations or you will never learn English!!
Lo siento, ha salido todo amontonado porque estoy teniendo problemas con la conexión y me es imposible responder citando.
Come one, you are new, you don't know me... You don't need to be so resented, I'm just a game character as you said, like a Sim... Like a sexy and delicious polygonized Sim.
And you are wrong: "she's just trolling around" was perfectly correct in that situation since I was pointing out an action that was actually happening then, and that btw seems to be happening now.
About my second "mistake", I'm perfectly aware that it's incorrect. Basically because if you erease "You and..." from that phrase it doesn't make sense, since I wouldn't say something like "me show English". However, this mistake is so oftenly done in contemporary English that it's considered a bit like "wanna", like a bastardization.
However, what it is incredibly wrong is to write:
=>wrongly constructed. "You assumed I wasn't going to Keep it up with the thread" would have been correct though. It's not that this thread is some kind of record, or something you can keep somewhere.First of all you assumed I was not going to keep the thread
=> Sounds awkward. Something like "you assumed I didn't want to reply while actually you were wrong" is way more correct there.Again you assumed I didn´t want to reply, and again you were wrong!
¿¿who is the one who assumes things about others???
EDIT: Btw, don't get too much happy about Ann liking your posts. It's just her sense of humor, like some kind of evil flirt she knows I like... in principle. Coming from her is not making her look charming. That's just when others do it to me...
Última edición hecha por jkhsdjkhsdkj, 06/11/2012 a las 2:26.